Development and validation of Tripartite Schadenfreude Scale

Sana Safia, Adnan Adil, Saba Ghayas, Sultan Shujja

Accepted July 30, 2024

First published August 25, 2024

https://doi.org/10.26387/bpa.2024.00009

Abstract

Entrenched in the tripartite motivational model of schadenfreude (Wang, Lilienfeld & Rochat, 2019), this
study developed and validated a self-report measure of schadenfreude. In Study 1, a pool of 36 items was developed
after a thorough review of the literature and expert opinions. The content validity index for the items and scale was
established after obtaining the ratings of four experts. Con!rmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the item pool of the Tripartite
Schadenfreude Scale (TSS) in a purposive sample of 300 students at the University of Sargodha revealed a second-order
three-factor solution consistent with the tripartite motivational model of schadenfreude. The !rst-order factor loadings
ranged from .60 to .80 and their Cronbach’s alpha coef!cients of reliability ranged from .73 to .94. TSS and its three factors
demonstrated a strong positive correlation with the Perceived Schadenfreude Scale (Batool, 2014), which established
evidence of convergent validity. Study 2 replicated the factorial structure of TSS in a purposive sample of 219 students at
the University of Sargodha. Moreover, TSS did not correlate with shame or guilt, indicating discriminant validity. Overall,
these !ndings suggest that the newly developed TSS is a psychometrically sound measure of tripartite schadenfreude.

References

  • BAREN, A. (2017). Why some take pleasure in other people’spain: The role of attachment, competition, and cooperationon schadenfreude. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, City University of New York.

  • BARRETT, K.C. (1995). A functionalist approach to shame and guilt. In J.P. Tangney & K.W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

  • BATOOL, N. (2014). Schadenfreude among adolescents: Role of social comparison, self-esteem, episodic envoy and belief in just world. Unpublished MPhil thesis, National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

  • BROWN, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.

  • CAVALERA, C., PEPE, A., ZURLONI, V., DIANA, B., REALDON, O., & JIANG, R. (2017). A short version of the State Shame and Guilt Scale (SSGS-8). TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 24 (1), 99-106.

  • CIKARA, M., BOTVINICK, M.M., & FISKE, S.T. (2011). Us versus them: Social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm. Psychological Science, 22 (3), 306-313.

    doi.org/10.1177/0956797610397667
  • DEMIR, E., & RIGONI, U. (2017). You lose, I feel better: Rivalry between soccer teams and the impact of schadenfreude on stock market. Journal of Sports Economics, 18 (1), 58-76.

    doi.org/10.1177/1527002514551801
  • GREGORY, S. (2014). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications. London, England: Pearson

  • HAMLIN, J.K., MAHAJAN, N., LIBERMAN, Z., & WYNN, K. (2013). Not like me is bad: Infants prefer those who harm dissimilar others. Psychological Science, 24 (4), 589-594.

    doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457785
  • HAMLIN, J.K., & WYNN, K. (2011). Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cognitive Development, 26 (1), 30-39.

    doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.09.001
  • HARELI, S., & WEINER, B. (2002). Dislike and envy as antecedents of pleasure at another’s misfortune. Motivation and Emotion, 26(4), 257-277.

    doi.org/10.1023/A:1022818803399
  • HEIDER, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley.

  • JENSEN, K. (2012). Who cares? Other-regarding concerns – decisions with feeling. In P. Hammerstein, & J.R. Stevens (Eds.), Evolution and the mechanisms of decision making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • LEACH, C.W., SPEARS, R., BRANSCOMBE, N.R., & DOOSJE, B. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 932-943. psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/00223514.84.5.932

    doi.org/10.1037/00223514.84.5.932
  • LERNER, M.J., & MILLER, D.T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin,85(5),1030-1041.

    doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030
  • LYNN, M.R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382-385.

  • MALTBY, J. (2002). The Age Universal I-E Scale-12 and orientation toward religion: Confirmatory factor analysis. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 136 (5), 555-560.dx.

    doi.org/10.1080/00223980209605550
  • MARSHALL, W.L. (1994). Treatment effects on denial and minimization in incarcerated sex offenders. Behavior Research and Therapy, 32, 559-564.

  • MARSHALL, W.L., MARSHALL, L.E. SERRAN, G.A., & O’BRIEN, M.D. (2009). Self-esteem, shame, cognitive distortions and empathy in sexual offenders: Their integration and treatment implications. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15 (2), 217-234.

  • NOBES, G., PANAGIOTAKI, G., & PAWSON, C. (2009). The influence of negligence, intention, and outcome on children’s moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 104(4), 382-397.

    doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.08.001
  • ORCAN, F. (2018). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Which one to use first? Journal of Measurement and Evaluationin Education and Psychology, 9 (4), 414-421.

    doi.org/10.2103//epod.394323
  • PIETRASZKIEWICZ, A. (2013). Schadenfreude and just world belief. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65 (3), 188-194.

    doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12020
  • PISKORZ, J.E., & PISKORZ, Z. (2009). Situational determinants of envy and schadenfreude. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 40 (3),137-144. psycnet.apa.org/

    doi.org/10.2478/s10059-009-0030-2
  • PREACHER, K.J., & COFFMAN, D.L. (2006). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA [Computer software]. Retrieved from: http://quantpsy.org/

  • SAGHER, S. (2017). Correlates of internet addiction and sensation-seeking behavior among adolescents and young adults. Unpublished master’s thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

  • SCHAUFELI, W.B., BAKKER, A.B., & SALANOVA, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement,66 (4), 701-716.

  • SMITH, R.H., POWELL, C.A., COMBS, D.J., & SCHURTZ, D.R. (2009). Exploring the when and why of schadenfreude. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3 (4), 530-546.

    doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00181.x
  • SMITH, R.H., & VAN DIJK, W.W. (2018). Schadenfreude and Gluckschmerz. Emotion Review, 10 (4), 293-304.

    doi.org/10.1177/1754073918765657
  • STEINBEIS, N., & SINGER, T. (2013). The effects of social comparison on social emotions and behavior during childhood: The ontogeny of envy and schadenfreude predicts developmental changes inequity-related decisions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115 (1), 198-209.

    doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.009
  • TAJFEL, H., & TURNER, J.E. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Nelson-Hall.

  • TANGNEY, J.P. (1995). Shame and guilt in interpersonal relationships. In J.P. Tangney, & K.W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame and guilt, embarrassment, and pride. New York, NY: Guilford.

  • TANGNEY, J.P., & DEARING, R.L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: Guilford.

  • VAN DE VEN, N., HOOGLAND, C.E., SMITH, R.H., VAN DIJK, W.W., BREUGELMANS, S.M., & ZEELENBERG, M. (2015). When envy leads to schadenfreude. Cognition and Emotion, 29(6), 1007-1025.

  • VAN DIJK, W.W., GOSLINGA, S., & OUWERKERK, J.W. (2008). Impact of responsibility for misfortune on schadenfreude and sympathy: Further evidence. The Journal of Social Psychology,148 (5), 631-636.

    doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.148.5.631-636
  • VAN DIJK, W.W., & OUWERKERK, J.W. (2014). Introduction to schadenfreude. In W.W. van Dijk, & J.W. Ouwerkerk (Eds.), Schadenfreude: Understanding pleasure at the misfortune of others. Cambridge University Press.

  • VAN DIJK, W.W., OUWERKERK, J.W., GOSLINGA, S., & NIEWEG, M. (2005). Deserving ness and schadenfreude. Cognition and Emotion, 19 (6), 933-939. psycnet.apa.org/

    doi.org/10.1080/02699930541000066
  • VAN DIJK, W.W., WESSELING, Y.M., OUWERKERK, J.W., & VAN KONINGSBRUGGEN, G.M. (2010). The self-enhancing properties of another’s misfortune. Unpublished manuscript, Leiden University, The Netherlands.

  • WALTZ, C.F., STRICKLAND, O.L., & LENZ, E.R. (2005). Measurement in nursing and health research. Springer.

  • WANG, S., LILIENFELD, S.O., & ROCHAT, P. (2019). Schadenfreude deconstructed and reconstructed: A tripartite motivational model. New Ideas in Psychology, 52, 111.

    doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.09.002
SHOW ALL REFERENCES (39)HIDE REFERENCES

Article info

Cite the article:

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Safia Sana . Adil Adnan . Ghayas Saba . Shujja Sultan . Development and validation of Tripartite Schadenfreude Scale. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2024;300(1):21-45. doi:10.26387/bpa.300.1.

Citation tool

How to cite this article

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Safia Sana . Adil Adnan . Ghayas Saba . Shujja Sultan . Development and validation of Tripartite Schadenfreude Scale. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2024;300(1):21-45. doi:10.26387/bpa.300.1.