Italian version of the RIVEC Prejudice Scale

Paola Villano

Accepted April 30, 2019

First published April 30, 2019

https://doi.org/10.26387/bpa.284.2

Abstract

ᴥᴥ SUMMARY. The effects of intergroup contact on intolerance and discrimination have been a classical topic in social
psychology. Research has indeed focused on how the coexistence of different cultures affects intergroup dynamics,
particularly the processes that are related to tolerant versus biased attitudes towards other social groups. Based on the
classic blatant-subtle prejudice scale, the RIVEC Prejudice Scale was recently proposed, which assesses prejudice by
way of five components: threat and rejection (Rejection), loss of intimacy (Intimacy), traditional values (Values), denial of
positive emotions (Emotions), and cultural differences (Culture). In the present research, 409 participants responded to
the Italian version of this scale and to other scales related to prejudice: i.e., modern racism, social dominance orientation
(SDO), ethnocentrism, and zero-sum competition. RIVEC’s internal reliabilities were investigated and a confirmatory
factor analysis was performed. Results show adequate fit of both the total score and the single five dimensions.

Italian version of the RIVEC Prejudice Scale

References

  • AIELLO, A. & ARENI, A. (1998). Un aggiornamento della Scala di De

  • Grada ed altri (1975) per la misura dell’etnocentrismo. Rassegnadi Psicologia, 15 (2), 145-160.

  • ALLPORT, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Boston, MA:Addison-Wesley.

  • ARANCIBIA, H. (2014). Diseño Psicométrico y Validación de laEscala de Prejuicio RIVEC basada en los presupuestos de Pettigrew& Meertens (Doctoral thesis, Departamento de Psicología Socialy Metodología, Facultad de Psicología Universidad Autónoma deMadrid, Spain).

  • ARANCIBIA, H., BLANCO, A., RUIZ, M.Á. & CASTRO, M.C. (2016).Rivec (rejection, intimacy, values, emotions, and culture) prejudicescale: An adaptation to the chilean context of the blatant and subtleprejudice scale. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 10, 1-12.

  • ARANCIBIA, H., RUIZ, M.Á., BLANCO, A. & CÁRDENAS,M. (2016). New evidence of construct validity problems for

  • Pettigrew and Meertens’ (1995) Blatant and Subtle PrejudiceScale. Psychological Reports, 118 (2), 544-564.

  • ARCURI, L. & BOCA, S. (1996). Pregiudizio e affiliazione politica:destra e sinistra di fronte all’immigrazione dal terzo mondo. InP. Legrenzi & V. Girotto, Psicologia e Politica. Milano: RaffaelloCortina.

  • BROWN, R. (2011). Prejudice: Its social psychology. Chichester: JohnWiley & Sons.

  • CÁRDENAS CASTRO, M. (2010). Forms of ethnic prejudice:assessing the dimensionality of a Spanish-language version of theBlatant and Subtle Prejudice Scale. Psicothema, 22 (1), 118-124.

  • COENDERS, M., SCHEEPERS, P., SNIDERMAN, P.M. & VERBERK,G.(2001).Blatantandsubtleprejudice:dimensions,determinants,and consequences; some comments on Pettigrew and Meertens.European Journal of Social Psychology, 31 (3), 281-297.

  • CRAMWINCKEL, F.M., der TOORN, J. & SCHEEPERS, D.T. (2018).Interventions to reduce blatant and subtle Sexual Orientation‐and Gender Identity Prejudice (SOGIP): Current knowledge andfuture directions. Social Issues and Policy Review, 12 (1), 183-217.

  • CRANDALL, C.S. & STANGOR, C. (2005). Conformity andprejudice. In J.F. Dovidio, P. Glick & L.A. Rudman (Eds.), Onthe nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport. Malden MA.:Blackwell.

  • DOVIDIO, J.F., HEWSTONE, M., GLICK, P. & ESSES, V.M. (2010).Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical andempirical overview. In D.C. Mutz & S.K.Goldman (Eds.), TheSAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination.London, UK: Sage.

  • DOVIDIO, J.F. & JONES, J.M. (2019). Prejudice, stereotyping, anddiscrimination. In E.J. Finkel & R.F. Baumeister (Eds.), Advancedsocial psychology: The state of the science. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.

  • FONTANELLA, L., VILLANO, P. & DI DONATO, M. (2016).Attitudes towards Roma people and migrants: A comparisonthrough a Bayesian multidimensional IRT model. Quality &Quantity, 50 (2), 471-490.

  • GATTINO, S., MIGLIETTA, A. & TESTA, S. (2008). Dimensionalityin Pettigrew and Meertens’ Blatant Subtle Prejudice Scale. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 15(3), 135-151.

  • GRAVETTER, F. & WALLNAU, L. (2014). Essentials of statistics forthe behavioral sciences (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

  • HO, A.K., SIDANIUS, J., PRATTO, F., LEVIN, S., THOMSEN,L., KTEILY, N. & SHEEHY-SKEFFINGTON, J. (2012). Socialdominance orientation: Revisiting the structure and function of avariable predicting social and political attitudes. Personality andSocial Psychology Bulletin, 38 (5), 583-606.

  • HU, L. & BENTLER, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes incovariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus newalternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A MultidisciplinaryJournal, 6 (1), 1-55.

  • KROLIKOWSKI, A.M., RINELLA, M. & RATCLIFF, J.J. (2016). Theinfluence of the expression of subtle and blatant sexual prejudiceon personal prejudice and identification with the expresser.Journal of homosexuality, 63 (2), 228-249.

  • KRUEGER, J.I., HALL, J.H., VILLANO, P. & JONES, M.C. (2008).Attribution and categorization effects in the representation ofgender stereotypes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11(3), 401-414.

  • LA BARBERA, F. & CARIOTA FERRARA, P. (2010). Subtle andblatant prejudice toward Chinese, Moroccan, and Polishimmigrants in an Italian province. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics,Methodology in Applied Psychology, 17, 217-227.

  • LEACH, C.W. (2005). Against the notion of a ‘new racism’. Journal ofCommunity & Applied Social Psychology, 15 (6), 432-445.

  • LEONE, L., CHIRUMBOLO, A. & AIELLO, A. (2006). Pregiudiziosottile e pregiudizio manifesto: Alcuni rilievi critici sullo

  • strumento di Pettigrew e Meertens (1995). Giornale Italiano diPsicologia, 33 (1), 175-198.

  • MANCINI, T. & CARBONE, E. (2007). Identità territoriale,nazionale, europea, culturale e cosmopolita e pregiudizio latentee manifesto. Una ricerca su un gruppo di studenti universitari.Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 34 (1), 117-146.

  • MANGANELLI RATTAZZI, A.M. & VOLPATO, C. (2001). Formesottili e manifeste di pregiudizio verso gli immigrati. GiornaleItaliano di Psicologia, 28 (2), 351-378.

  • McDONALD, R.P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • MEERTENS, R.W. & PETTIGREW, T.F. (1997). Is subtle prejudicereally prejudice? The Public Opinion Quarterly, 61 (1), 54-71.

  • OLSON, M.A. (2009). Measures of prejudice. In T. Nelson (Ed.),Handbook of Prejudice. New York: Psychology Press.

  • PASSINI,S.(2017).Differentwaysofbeingauthoritarian:Thedistincteffects of authoritarian dimensions on values and prejudice.Political Psychology, 38 (1), 73-86.

  • PASSINI, S. & VILLANO, P. (2013). Judging moral issues in amulticultural society. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 72, 235-239.

  • PASSINI, S. & VILLANO, P. (2018). Left-right orientation andelectoral choices: Divergences in the relationships with authorityand out-groups. Psychological Reports, 121 (6), 1131-1146.

  • PEDERSEN, A., CLARKE, S., DUDGEON, P. & GRIFFITHS, B.(2005). Attitudes toward Indigenous Australians and asylumseekers: The role of false beliefs and other social‐psychologicalvariables. Australian Psychologist, 40 (3), 170-178.

  • PETTIGREW, T.F. & MEERTENS, R.W. (1995). Subtle and blatantprejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of SocialPsychology, 25, 57-75.

  • PIRCHIO, S., PASSIATORE, Y., PANNO, A., MARICCHIOLO, F.& CARRUS, G. (2018). A chip off the old block: Parents’ subtleethnic prejudice predicts children’s implicit prejudice. Frontiersin Psychology, 9, 1-9.

  • ROSSEEL, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equationmodeling and more. Version 0.5-12 (BETA). Journal of StatisticalSoftware, 48 (2), 1-36.

  • SCHWARTZ, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure ofvalues: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries.In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

  • SHEPHERD, L., FASOLI, F., PEREIRA, A. & BRANSCOMBE, N.R.(2018). The role of threat, emotions, and prejudice in promotingcollective action against immigrant groups. European Journal ofSocial Psychology, 48 (4), 447-459.

  • UNGARETTI, J., ETCHEZAHAR, E. & BARREIRO, A. (2018).Validation of the subtle and blatant prejudice scale towardsindigenous people in Argentina. Current Psychology, 1, 1-7.

  • VILLANO, P. (1999). Anti-Semitic prejudice in adolescence: An Italianstudy on shared beliefs. Psychological Reports, 84, 1372-1378.

  • VILLANO, P. & PASSINI, S. (2018). Competent in the North,passionate in the South. Stereotypes and prejudices betweennorthern and southern Italy. Psicologia Sociale, 13 (2), 91-106.

  • VILLANO, P. & ZANI, B. (2007). Social dominance orientation andprejudice in an Italian sample. Psychological Reports, 101 (2),614-616.

  • WOHL, M.J. & BRANSCOMBE, N.R. (2009). Group threat, collectiveangst, and ingroup forgiveness for the war in Iraq. PoliticalPsychology, 30 (2), 193-217.

SHOW ALL REFERENCES (45)HIDE REFERENCES

Article info

Issue:

Keywords:

Views:

67

Downloads:

39

Cite the article:

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Villano Paola . Italian version of the RIVEC Prejudice Scale. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2019;284(1):10-19. doi:10.26387/bpa.284.1.

Citation Tool

How to cite this article

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Villano Paola . Italian version of the RIVEC Prejudice Scale. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2019;284(1):10-19. doi:10.26387/bpa.284.1.