Proactive personality, Social well-being and civic participation in emerging adulthood

Manuela Zambianchi

Accepted December 29, 2023

First published November 24, 2024

Abstract

The phase of emerging adulthood is defined as a new life stage from late teens to early adulthood
(Arnett, 2004). It is considered, by developmental research, a critical life-phase, whose positive outcome is related to the
presence of resources such as social capital, civic engagement and civic participation (Masten et al., 2004; Hawkins et
al., 2009). The study has analyzed the role of proactive personality, a stable disposition toward an agentic intervention
in the environment and persevere until the individual is able bring about meaningful change, on two facets of positive
development, namely Social well-being and civic participation in the stage of emerging adulthood. 388 undergraduates
of University Campus of Rimini (mean age = 20.08; SD = 1.72, range 18-31; 19% males and 81% females) participated
in the study. They filled in three self-report questionnaire, the Proactive Personality Scale (Bateman & Crant, 1993), the
Civic Participation Questionnaire (Albanesi et al., 2007), the Social Well-being Questionnaire (Keyes, 1998). We found
positive correlations between proactive personality, civic engagement and Social well-being. Hierarchical regression
models highlighted that the two dimensions of proactive personality, proactive persistence in front of obstacles and
proactive constructive environmental agency constitute the most important predictors of overall Social well-being, Social
integration, Social contribution as its sub-components. They also give an important contribution to civic engagement
after controlling for structural variables age, gender and degree course.

References

  • ALBANESI, C., CICOGNANI, E. & ZANI, B. (2007). Sense ofcommunity, civic engagement and social well-being in Italianadolescents. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology,13 , 387–406.

  • ALBANESI, C., ZANI, B. & CICOGNANI, E. (2012). Youth civic andpolitical participation through the lens of gender: The Italiancase. Human Affairs, 22, 360-374.

  • ARNETT, J.J. (2004). Emerging Adulthood: the winding road from lateteens through the twenties. London: Oxford University Press.

  • ARNETT, J.J. & JENSEN, L.A. (2002). A congregation of one:individualized religious beliefs among emerging adults. Journalof Adolescent Research, 17, 451-467.

  • BANDURA, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York:Freeman.

  • BARBER, C. & TORNEY-PURTA, J. (2012). Comparing attitudes inthe 1999 and 2009 IEA Civic and Citizenship Education Studies:opportunities and limitations illustrated in five countries. Journalof Social Science Education, 1, 47-74.

  • BATEMAN, T.S. & CRANT, J.M. (1993). The proactive componentof organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal ofOrganizational Behavior, 14, 103-118.

  • BECK, U. & GERNSHEIM, E. (2002). Individualization:Institutionalized individualismand its social and politicalconsequences. London: Sage.

  • CICOGNANI, E., ALBANESI,C. & BERTI, P. (2001). Dimensionsof social well-being: a measurement instrument. Psicologia dellaSalute (Health Psychology), 1, 105-123.

  • CICOGNANI,E.,PIRINI,C.,KEYES,C.,JOSHANLOO,M.,ROSTAMI,R. & NOSRATABADI, M. (2008). Social participation, sense ofcommunity and social well-being: a study on American, Italian andIranian university students. Social Indicator Research,1, 98-112.

  • CICOGNANI, E., ZANI, B., FOUMIER, B., GAVRAY, C. & BORN,M. (2012). Gender differences in youths’ political engagementand participation. The role of parents and of adolescents’ socialand civic participation. Journal of Adolescence, 3, 561-576.

  • COFFÈ, H., & BOLZENDAHL, C. (2010). Same Game, DifferentRules? Gender Differences in Political Participation. Sex Roles,62(5), 318-30.

  • CROCETTI, E., ERENTAITÈ, R. & ZUKAUSKIENE, R. (2014).Identitystyles,positiveyouthdevelopment,andcivicengagementin adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 11, 1818-1828.

  • CROCETTI, E., JAHROMI, P. & MEUUS, W. (2012). Identity andcivic engagement in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 35,521-532.

  • CROCETTI, E., RUBINI, M. & MEEUS, W. (2008). Capturing thedynamics of identity formation in various groups: developmentand validation of three dimensional model. Journal ofAdolescence, 31, 207-222.

  • EACEA (2013). Political participation and EU Citizenship:Perceptions and Behaviours of Young People. Available at:https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/europe-forcitizens_en

  • ELDER, G.H. JR. (1994). Time, Human Agency and Social Change:Perspective on the Life Course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 1,4-15.

  • FISHMAN, R. (2004). Democracy’s voices: Social ties and the qualityof life in Spain. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

  • FLANAGAN, C.A. (2004). Volunteerism, leadership, politicalsocialization, and civic engagement. In R.M. Lerner & L.Steinberg, (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 721-746). New York: Wiley.

  • FRESE, M., FAY, D., HILBURGER, T., LENG, K. & TAG, A. (1997).The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliabilityand validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational andOrganizational Psychology, 70, 139-161.

  • HAWKINS, M.T., LECHTER, P., SANSON, A., SMART, D. &TOMBOUROU, J.W. (2009). Positive development in emergingadulthood. Australian Journal of Psychology, 2, 89-99.

  • HILL, L.H., SUMNER, R. & BURROW, A.L. (2014). Understandingthe pathways to purpose: examining personality and well-being.Correlates across adulthood. The Journal of Positive Psychology,3, 227-234.

  • HOLAHAN,C.K.&CHAPMAN,J.R.(2002).Longitudinalpredictorsof proactive goals and activity participation at age 80. Journal ofGerontology, Series B, Psychological Science, 5, 418-425.

  • JAHROMI, P., CROCETTI, E. & BUCHANAN, C. (2012). Across-cultural examination of adolescent civic engagement:Comparing Italian and American volunteerism and politicalinvolvement. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in theCommunity, 40, 22–36.

  • KELLY, D.C. (2008). In preparation for adulthood: exploring civicparticipation and social trust among young minorities. Youth &Society, 40, 526-540.

  • KEYES,C.M.L.(1998).Socialwell-being.SocialPsychologyQuarterly,2, 121-140.

  • KEYES, C.M.L. (2007). Promoting mental health as flourishing: acomplementary strategy for improving national mental health.American Psychologist, 2, 95-108.

  • KIM,T.Y.,HON,A.H.Y.&CRANT,J.M.(2009).Proactivepersonality,employee creativity, and newcomer outcomes: A longitudinalstudy. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 93-103.

  • KIRKMAN, B.L. & ROSEN, B. (1999). Beyond self management:Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academyof Management Journal, 42, 58-74.

  • KOSTERMAN, R., HAWKINS, J.D., ABBOTT, R.D., HILL, K.G.,HERRENKOHL, T.I. & CATALANO, R.F. (2005). Measuresof positive adult behavior and their relationship to crime andsubstance use. Prevention Science, 6, 21–33.

  • LECCARDI, C. (2009). Sociologie del tempo (Sociologies of Time).Bari: Laterza.

  • LERNER, R.M. (2006). Developmental science, developmentalsystems, and contemporary theories of human development. InR.M. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology:Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., Vol. 1, 1–17).Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

  • MAGNUSSON, D. & ENDLER, N.S. (Eds.). (1977). Personality at thecrossroads: Current issues in international psychology. Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.

  • MASTEN, A.S., BURT, K.B., ROISMAN, G.I., OBRADOVIC, J.,LONG, J.D. & TELLEGEN, A. (2004). Resources and resiliencein the transition to adulthood: Continuity and Change.Development and Psychopathology, 16 , 1071–1094.

  • O’TOOLE,T.,LISTER,M.,MARSH,D.,JONES,S.&McDONAGH,A.(2003). Tuning out or left out? Participation and nonparticipationamong young people. Contemporary Politics, 9(1), 45-61.

  • PARKER, S.K., BINDL, U.K. & STRAUSS, K. (2010). Makingthings happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal ofManagement, 36, 827-856.

  • PUTNAM, R. (1995). Bowling alone: American declining socialcapital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.

  • SCHWARZER, R. (1999). The proactive attitude scale (PA scale).http: //userpage.fu-berlin.de/health/proactive.htm.

  • SCHWARZER, R. & TAUBERT, S. (2002). Tenacious goal pursuitand striving toward personal growth: proactive coping. In E.Fyndenberg (ed.), Beyond coping; meeting goals, visions andchallenges (pp.19-35). London: Oxford University Press.

  • SMITH, C. (1999). The effects of investment in the social capital ofyouth on political and civic behavior in young adulthood: Alongitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 20, 553-580.

  • SNELL, P. (2010). Emerging adult civic and political disengagement:A longitudinal analysis of lack of involvement with politics.Journal of Adolescent Research, 2, 258-287.

  • TANNER, J.L. & ARNETT, J.J. (2009). Handbook of youth and youngadulthood. London and New York: Routledge.

  • TERBORG, J.R. (1981). Interactional psychology and research onhuman behavior in organizations. Academy of ManagementReview, 6, 569-576.

  • TRIFLETTI, E., CAPOZZA, D., PASIN, A. & FALVO, R. (2009).A validation of the proactive personality scale. Testing,Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 16, 77-93.

  • TWENGE, J.M., CAMPBELL, W.K. & FREEMAN, E.C. (2012).Generational differences in young adults’ life goals, concern forothers, and civic orientation, 1966-2009. Personality Processesand Individual Differences, 5, 1045-1062.

  • ZAMBIANCHI, M. & RICCI BITTI, P.E. (2014). Prospettivatemporale e benessere sociale nell’adulto emergente (TimePerspective and Social Well-being in Emerging Adulthood).Psicologia della Salute (Health Psychology), 1, 125-138

  • ZAMBIANCHI,M.&RICCI BITTI,P.E.(2014).Theroleofproactivecoping strategies, time perspective, perceived efficacy on affectregulation, divergent thinking and family communication inpromoting social well-being in emerging adulthood. SocialIndicator Research, 116, 493-507.

  • ZANI, B. (2012). Empowerment: Analisi di un costrutto intrigante(Empowerment: Analysis of an intriguing construct). In B. Zani(Ed.).PsicologiadiComunità.Prospettive,idee,metodi(CommunityPsychology. Perspectives, ideas, methods). Roma: Carocci.

  • ZIMMERMANN,M.A. (2000). Empowerment theory. Psychological,Organizational and Community level of analysis. In J. Rapaport,E. Seidman, Handbook of Community Psychology. New York:Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

SHOW ALL REFERENCES (49)HIDE REFERENCES

Related articles

Article info

Cite the article:

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Zambianchi Manuela . Proactive personality, Social well-being and civic participation in emerging adulthood. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 1970;(1):3-18.

Citation tool

How to cite this article

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Zambianchi Manuela . Proactive personality, Social well-being and civic participation in emerging adulthood. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 1970;(1):3-18.