The Factor Structure of the Italian version of the MCMI-III compared to the Dutch and American versions

Claudia Pignolo, Rosalba Rosato, Agata Andò, Stefania Cristofanelli, Laura Ferro, Alessandro Zennaro

Accepted April 30, 2017

First published April 30, 2017

https://doi.org/10.26387/bpa.278.4

Abstract

Previously factor analytic research on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) using different factor extraction procedures, found three or four factors. In particular, Rossi, van der Ark, and Sloore (2007), through a sophisticated research design that examined and compared various aspects of the factor structure of the MCMI-III, identified a four-factor solutions for both male and female subsamples and for both linearly dependent and independent scales. The aim of this study was to explore the factor structure of the Italian version of the MCMI-III using both linearly dependent and independent scales, to evaluate gender differences, and to compare our results with the Dutch and American factor structure. Method: The present study used a sample of 881 psychiatric patients of Northern and Central Italy. Principal Factor Analysis with direct oblimin rotation was performed for the entire sample and for both men and women. Results: We identified four factors that were similar for men and women, but we found differences in content between solutions with overlapping and non-overlapping scale. The four-factor solution was similar to the Dutch one and the first two factors were congruent with the three-factor solution proposed in American studies. Conclusions: Taken together, our findings indicate that the factor structure of the MCMI-III is consistent across countries.

References

  • AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC.

  • ANDERSON, T.W. & RUBIN, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factor analysis. In J. Neyman (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (pp. 111-150). Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • BENTLER, P.M. & BONETT, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analyses of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.

    DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.
  • CARDENAL, V. & SÁNCHEZ, M.P. (2007). Adaptación y baremación al español del Inventario Clínico Multiaxial de Millon-III (MCMI-III). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.

  • CHOCA, J., RETZLAFF, P., STRACK, S., MOUTON, A. & VANDENBURG, E. (1996). Factor elements in Millon’s personality theory. Journal of Personality Disorders, 10(4), 377-383.

    DOI:10.1521/pedi.1996.10.4.377.
  • COMREY, A.L. & LEE, H.B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • CRAIG, R.J. & BIVENS, A. (1998). Factor structure of the MCMI-III. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(1), 190-196.

    DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa7001_13.
  • CUEVAS, L., GARCÍA, L.F., ALUJA, A. & GARCÍA, O. (2008). Exploratory and confirmatory factor structure of the MCMI-III Personality Disorders: Overlapping versus non-overlapping scales. European Journal of Psychiatry, 22(2), 59-68.

    DOI:10.4321/S0213-61632008000200001.
  • D’ELIA, A. & LAGIER, P.M. (1986). Inventaire clinique multiaxial de Millon. Montréal: Bureau d’intervention psychosociale.

  • FENIGOLD, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: Meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429-456.

    DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429.
  • GORSUCH, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • HADDY, C., STRACK, S. & CHOCA, J.P. (2005). Linking personality disorders and clinical syndromes on the MCMI-III. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84(2), 193-204.

    DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa8402_09.
  • HORN, J.L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185.

    DOI:10.1007/BF02289447.
  • LINDSAY, K.A., SANKIS, L.M. & WIDIGER, T.A. (2000). Gender bias in self-report personality disorder inventories. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14(3), 218-232.

    DOI:10.1521/pedi.2000.14.3.218.
  • LORENZO-SEVA, U. & ten BERGE, J.M.F. (2006). Tucker’s Congruence Coefficient as a MeaningfulI index of Factor Similarity. Methodology, 2(2), 57-64.

    DOI:10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57.
  • MARDIA, K.V., KENT, J.T. & BIBBY, J.M. (1979). Multivariate analysis. London: Academic.

  • McDONALD, R.P. & KRANE, W.R. (1977). A note on local identifiability and degrees of freedom in the asymptotic likelihood ratio test. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,30(2), 198-203.

    DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1977.tb00739.x.
  • McDONALD, R.P. & KRANE, W.R. (1979). A Monte Carlo study of local identifiability and degrees of freedom in the asymptotic likelihood ratio test. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 32(1), 121-132.

    DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1979.tb00757.x.
  • MILLON, T. (1994). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III manual. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.

  • MILLON, T., MILLON, C., DAVIS, R.D. & GROSSMAN, S.D. (2009). Million Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.

  • MULAIK, S.A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • NUNNALLY, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • O’CONNOR, B.P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,32(3), 396-402.

    DOI:10.3758/BF03200807.
  • O’CONNOR, B.P. & DYCE, J.A. (1998). A test of models of personality disorders configuration. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107(1),3-16.

    DOI:10.1037/0021-843X.107.1.3.
  • REISE, S.P., SMITH, L. & FURR, R.M. (2001). Invariance on the NEOPI-R neuroticism scale. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(1),83–110.

    DOI:10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_04.
  • RINDSKOPF, D. (1984). Structural equation models: Empirical identification, Heywood cases, and related problems. Sociological Methods and Research, 13(1), 109-119.

    DOI:10.1177/0049124184013001004.
  • ROSSI, G., VANDERARK, L.A. & SLOORE, H. (2007). Factor Analysis of the Dutch-Language Version of the MCMI-III. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(2), 144-157.

    DOI:10.1080/00223890701267977.
  • SLOORE, H.V. & DERKSEN, J.L.L. (1997). Issues and procedures in MCMI translations. In T. Millon (Ed.), The Millon inventories: Clinical and personality assessment (pp. 287-302). New York: Guilford.

  • SLOORE, H., DERKSEN, J. & De MEY, H. (1994). MCMI-III. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Pen Test.

  • TEN BERGE, J.M.F. (1986). Rotation to perfect congruence and the cross validation of component weights across populations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21(1), 41-64.

    DOI:10.1207/s15327906mbr2101_3.
  • TUCKER, L.R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies (Personnel Research Section Report, No. 984). Washington, DC: Department of the Army.

  • VAN DE VIJVER, F. & LEUNG, K. (1997). Ethnic attitudes in relation to ethnic pride and ethnic differentiation. Journal of Social Psychology, 141(5), 583-601.

    doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600573
  • WEST, S.G. & FINCH, J.F. (1997). Personality measurement: Reliability and validity issues. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 143–164). SanDiego, CA: Academic.

  • WEST, S.G., FINCH, J.F. & CURRAN, P.J. (1995). Structural equation models with non normal variables. Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56-75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • WIDIGER,T.A. & SAMUEL, D.B. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of personality disorders. Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 278-287.

    DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.278.
  • CATTEL, R.B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245-276.

    DOI:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
  • ZENNARO, A., FERRACUTI, F., LANG, M. & SANAVIO, E. (2008). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory – III (MCMI-III). Manuale. Firenze: Giunti O.S.

  • ZENNARO, A., FERRACUTI, S., LANG, M., ROCCARO, G.,ROMA, P. & SANAVIO, E. (2013). Diagnostic validity statistics in MCMI-III applied to an Italian sample. Applied Psychology Bulletin, 267, 48-57.

SHOW ALL REFERENCES (38)HIDE REFERENCES

Related articles

Article info

Issue:

Keywords:

Views:

828

Downloads:

114

Cite the article:

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Pignolo Claudia. Rosato Rosalba. Andò Agata. Cristofanelli Stefania. Ferro Laura. Zennaro Alessandro. The Factor Structure of the Italian version of the MCMI-III compared to the Dutch and American versions. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2017;278(1):36-46. doi:10.26387/bpa.278.1.

Citation tool

How to cite this article

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Pignolo Claudia. Rosato Rosalba. Andò Agata. Cristofanelli Stefania. Ferro Laura. Zennaro Alessandro. The Factor Structure of the Italian version of the MCMI-III compared to the Dutch and American versions. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2017;278(1):36-46. doi:10.26387/bpa.278.1.