• 6A55CB5D-61F4-41B9-BFA5-FEA07DB5A942 BPA - Applied Psychology Bulletin I Giunti Psychometrics

LOGIN

SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE
ico/view
ico/autori
ABOUT THE JOURNAL
ISSUES
FOR AUTHORS
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE
ABOUT THE JOURNAL
ISSUES
FOR AUTHORS
  • Home
  • The Factor Structure of the Italian version of the MCMI-III compared to the Dutch and American versions
  • Home
  • Issue 278
  • The Factor Structure of the Italian version of the MCMI-III compared to the Dutch and American versions

The Factor Structure of the Italian version of the MCMI-III compared to the Dutch and American versions

Claudia Pignolo, Rosalba Rosato, Agata Andò, Stefania Cristofanelli, Laura Ferro, Alessandro Zennaro

Accepted April 30, 2017

First published April 30, 2017

Abstract

Previously factor analytic research on the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) using different factor extraction procedures, found three or four factors. In particular, Rossi, van der Ark, and Sloore (2007), through a sophisticated research design that examined and compared various aspects of the factor structure of the MCMI-III, identified a four-factor solutions for both male and female subsamples and for both linearly dependent and independent scales. The aim of this study was to explore the factor structure of the Italian version of the MCMI-III using both linearly dependent and independent scales, to evaluate gender differences, and to compare our results with the Dutch and American factor structure. Method: The present study used a sample of 881 psychiatric patients of Northern and Central Italy. Principal Factor Analysis with direct oblimin rotation was performed for the entire sample and for both men and women. Results: We identified four factors that were similar for men and women, but we found differences in content between solutions with overlapping and non-overlapping scale. The four-factor solution was similar to the Dutch one and the first two factors were congruent with the three-factor solution proposed in American studies. Conclusions: Taken together, our findings indicate that the factor structure of the MCMI-III is consistent across countries.

References

  • AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION (1994). Diagnostic andstatistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC:Author.

  • ANDERSON, T.W. & RUBIN, H. (1956). Statistical inference in factoranalysis. In J. Neyman (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third BerkeleySymposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (pp. 111-150). Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • BENTLER, P.M. & BONETT, D.G. (1980). Significance testsand goodness-of-fit in the analyses of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.

  • CARDENAL, V. & SÁNCHEZ, M.P. (2007). Adaptación y baremaciónal español del Inventario Clínico Multiaxial de Millon-III (MCMI-III). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.

  • CHOCA, J., RETZLAFF, P., STRACK, S., MOUTON, A. & VANDENBURG, E. (1996). Factor elements in Millon’s personalitytheory. Journal of Personality Disorders, 10(4), 377-383.DOI:10.1521/pedi.1996.10.4.377.

  • COMREY, A.L. & LEE, H.B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • CRAIG, R.J. & BIVENS, A. (1998). Factor structure of the MCMI-III.Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(1), 190-196. DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa7001_13.

  • CUEVAS, L., GARCÍA, L.F., ALUJA, A. & GARCÍA, O. (2008).Exploratory and confirmatory factor structure of the MCMI-III Personality Disorders: Overlapping versus non-overlappingscales.EuropeanJournalofPsychiatry,22(2),59-68.DOI:10.4321/S0213-61632008000200001.

  • D’ELIA, A. & LAGIER, P.M. (1986). Inventaire clinique multiaxial deMillon. Montréal: Bureau d’intervention psychosociale.

  • FENIGOLD, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality:Meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 429-456.DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429.

  • GORSUCH, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

  • HADDY, C., STRACK, S. & CHOCA, J.P. (2005). Linking personalitydisorders and clinical syndromes on the MCMI-III. Journalof Personality Assessment, 84(2), 193-204. DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa8402_09.

  • HORN,J.L.(1965).Arationaleandtestforthenumberoffactorsinfactoranalysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185. DOI:10.1007/BF02289447.

  • LINDSAY, K.A., SANKIS, L.M. & WIDIGER, T.A. (2000). Genderbias in self-report personality disorder inventories. Journalof Personality Disorders, 14(3), 218-232. DOI:10.1521/pedi.2000.14.3.218.

  • LORENZO-SEVA, U. & ten BERGE, J.M.F. (2006). Tucker’sCongruenceCoefficientasaMeaningfulIndexofFactorSimilarity.Methodology, 2(2), 57-64. DOI:10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57.

  • MARDIA, K.V., KENT, J.T. & BIBBY, J.M. (1979). Multivariateanalysis. London: Academic.

  • McDONALD, R.P. & KRANE, W.R. (1977). A note on localidentifiability and degrees of freedom in the asymptotic likelihoodratiotest.BritishJournalofMathematicalandStatisticalPsychology,30(2), 198-203. DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1977.tb00739.x.

  • McDONALD, R.P. & KRANE, W.R. (1979). A Monte Carlo studyof local identifiability and degrees of freedom in the asymptoticlikelihoodratiotest.BritishJournalofMathematicalandStatisticalPsychology, 32(1), 121-132. DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1979.tb00757.x.

  • MILLON, T. (1994). Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III manual.Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.

  • MILLON, T., MILLON, C., DAVIS, R.D. & GROSSMAN, S.D. (2009).Million Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III manual. Minneapolis,MN: Pearson Assessments.

  • MULAIK, S.A. (1972). The foundations of factor analysis. New York:McGraw-Hill.

  • NUNNALLY, J. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York:McGraw-Hill.

  • O’CONNOR, B.P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determiningthe number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’sMAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,32(3), 396-402. DOI:10.3758/BF03200807.

  • O’CONNOR,B.P.&DYCE,J.A.(1998).Atestofmodelsofpersonalitydisorders configuration. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107(1),3-16. DOI:10.1037/0021-843X.107.1.3.

  • REISE, S.P., SMITH, L. & FURR, R.M. (2001). Invariance on the NEOPI-R neuroticism scale. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(1),83–110. DOI:10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_04.

  • RINDSKOPF, D. (1984). Structural equation models: Empiricalidentification, Heywood cases, and related problems. SociologicalMethods and Research, 13(1), 109-119. DOI:10.1177/0049124184013001004.

  • ROSSI,G.,VANDERARK,L.A.&SLOORE,H.(2007).FactorAnalysisoftheDutch-LanguageVersionoftheMCMI-III.Journal ofPersonalityAssessment, 88(2), 144-157. DOI:10.1080/00223890701267977.

  • SLOORE, H.V. & DERKSEN, J.L.L. (1997). Issues and procedures inMCMI translations. In T. Millon (Ed.), The Millon inventories:Clinical and personality assessment (pp. 287-302). New York:Guilford.

  • SLOORE, H., DERKSEN, J. & De MEY, H. (1994). MCMI-III.Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Pen Test.

  • TEN BERGE, J.M.F. (1986). Rotation to perfect congruence andthe cross validation of component weights across populations.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21(1), 41-64. DOI:10.1207/s15327906mbr2101_3.

  • TUCKER, L.R. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies(Personnel Research Section Report, No. 984). Washington, DC:Department of the Army.

  • VAN DE VIJVER, F. & LEUNG, K. (1997). Ethnic attitudes in relationto ethnic pride and ethnic differentiation. Journal of SocialPsychology, 141(5), 583-601.

    doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600573

  • WEST, S.G. & FINCH, J.F. (1997). Personality measurement:Reliability and validity issues. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson & S. Briggs(Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 143–164). SanDiego, CA: Academic.

  • WEST, S.G., FINCH, J.F. & CURRAN, P.J. (1995). Structural equationmodels with nonnormal variables. Problems and remedies. InR. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issuesand applications (pp. 56-75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

  • WIDIGER,T.A.&SAMUEL,D.B.(2005).Evidence-basedassessmentof personality disorders. Psychological Assessment, 17(3), 278-287. DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.278.

  • CATTEL, R.B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245-276. DOI:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.

  • ZENNARO, A., FERRACUTI, F., LANG, M. & SANAVIO, E. (2008).Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory – III (MCMI-III). Manuale.Firenze: Giunti O.S.

  • ZENNARO, A., FERRACUTI, S., LANG, M., ROCCARO, G.,ROMA, P. & SANAVIO, E. (2013). Diagnostic validity statisticsin MCMI-III applied to an Italian sample. Applied PsychologyBulletin, 267, 48-57.

SHOW ALL REFERENCES (38)HIDE REFERENCES

Related articles

Article info

Issue:

Issue 278

Keywords:

Cross-cultural

Factor structure

Gender

MCMI-III

Views:

200

Downloads:

70

Cite the article:

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Pignolo Claudia. Rosato Rosalba. Andò Agata. Cristofanelli Stefania. Ferro Laura. Zennaro Alessandro. The Factor Structure of the Italian version of the MCMI-III compared to the Dutch and American versions. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2017;278(1):36-46.
CITE THE ARTICLE
3195

Giunti Psychometrics

Giunti Psychometrics is the historic publisher of psychometric tests, psychology books, CME training courses and psychodiagnostic tools.

BPA - BULLETIN OF APPLIED PSYHOLOGY

Scientific Director: Alessandro Zennaro

Copyright © 2021 by Giunti Psychometrics

MANAGEMENT AND EDITORIAL OFFICE

Via Fra Paolo Sarpi, 7/A

50136 Firenze

Tel. 055 6236 501

mail: bpa@giuntipsy.com

ABOUT US
Copyright © 2021 Giunti Psychometrics | P. IVA 00421250481 · Giunti Psychometrics Srl, tutti i diritti riservati Responsabile della Protezione dei Dati (Art. 37 del REG UE 2016/679) Avv. Victoria Parise privacy@giuntipsy.com

Citation tool

How to cite this article

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Pignolo Claudia. Rosato Rosalba. Andò Agata. Cristofanelli Stefania. Ferro Laura. Zennaro Alessandro. The Factor Structure of the Italian version of the MCMI-III compared to the Dutch and American versions. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2017;278(1):36-46.