• 6A55CB5D-61F4-41B9-BFA5-FEA07DB5A942 BPA - Applied Psychology Bulletin I Giunti Psychometrics

LOGIN

SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE
ico/view
ico/autori
ABOUT THE JOURNAL
ISSUES
FOR AUTHORS
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE
ABOUT THE JOURNAL
ISSUES
FOR AUTHORS
  • Home
  • Italian validation of the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale (GCBS)

Italian validation of the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale (GCBS)

Lorenzo Antichi, Martina Olcese, Davide Prestia, Giacomo Barbagallo, Laura Migliorini, Marco Giannini

Accepted December 11, 2023

First published December 22, 2023

https://doi.org/10.26387/bpa.2023.00016

Abstract

Although conspiracy theories influence Italian society, there are no Italian questionnaires to evaluate
conspiracist ideation. Hence, the study aimed to validate the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale (GCBS) in Italian,
investigating its validity and reliability. The validation has been done in 2 studies. Specifically, participants completed
a translated version of GCBS in Study 1. Explorative Factor Analysis (EFA) showed that the five-factor structure was
interpretable. Factors were government malfeasance (GM), extraterrestrial cover-up (ET), malevolent global conspiracies
(MG), personal well-being (PW), and control of information (CI). Finally, overall internal consistency was excellent (a = .93). Regarding study Study 2, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) confirmed the structure’s excellent fit indexes (c2/df = 2.87, robust CFI = .957, robust TLI = .941, robust RSMEA = .066, 90% CI [.054, .078]; SRMR = .041). In addition, convergent and criterion validity were acceptable. Finally, socio-demographic characteristics such as political orientation, age, and educational level were related to the likelihood of being engaged in conspiracy theories.

References

  • ANTICHI, L., GORETZKO, D. & GIANNINI, M. (2022). Assessingthe dimensionality of a new Italian Covid-19 conspiracy beliefsquestionnaire. Applied Psychology Bulletin, 293, 2-14.

    doi.org/10.26387/bpa.293.1

  • BENTLER, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models.Psychological Bulletin, 107 (2), 238-246.

    doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238

  • BIDDLESTONE, M., AZEVEDO, F. & VAN DER LINDEN, S. (2022).Climate of conspiracy: A meta-analysis of the consequences ofbelief in conspiracy theories about climate change. CurrentOpinion in Psychology, 46, 101390.

    doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101390

  • BIERWIACZONEK, K., KUNST, J.R. & PICH, O. (2020). Belief inCovid-19 conspiracy theories reduces social distancing overtime. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 12 (4), 1270-1285.

    doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12223

  • BROTHERTON, R. & ESER, S. (2015). Bored to fears: Boredomproneness, paranoia, and conspiracy theories. Personalityand Individual Differences, 80, 1-5.

    doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.011

  • BROTHERTON, R., FRENCH, C.C. & PICKERING, A.D. (2013).Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracistbeliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 279.

    doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279

  • BRUDER, M., HAFFKE, P., NEAVE, N., NOURIPANAH, N. &IMHOFF, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in genericbeliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracymentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 225.

    doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2013.00225

  • CASSESE, E.C., FARHART, C.E. & MILLER, J.M. (2020).Gender differences in Covid-19 conspiracy theory beliefs.Politics and Gender, 16 (14), 1009-1018.

    doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X20000409

  • CICHOCKA, A., MARCHLEWSKA, M. & DE ZAVALA, A.G.(2016). Does self-love or self-hate predict conspiracy beliefs?Narcissism, self-esteem, and the endorsement of conspiracytheories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7 (2), 157-166.

    doi.org/10.1177/1948550615616170

  • DARWIN, H., NEAVE, N. & HOLMES, J. (2011). Belief in conspiracytheories: The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation andschizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50 (8), 1289-1293.

    doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.02.027

  • DISEASES, T.L.I. (2020). The COVID-19 infodemic. The Lancet.Infectious Diseases, 20 (8), 875.

    doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30565-X

  • DOUGLAS, K.M., SUTTON, R.M. & CICHOCKA, A.(2017). The psychology of conspiracy theories. CurrentDirections in Psychological Science, 26 (6), 538-542.

    doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261

  • FREEMAN, D., WAITE, F., ROSEBROCK, L., PETIT, A., CAUSIER,C., EAST, A., JENNER, L., TEALE, A.L., CARR, L., MULHALL,S., BOLD, E. & LAMBE, S. (2020). Coronavirus conspiracybeliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelinesin England. Psychological Medicine, 52 (2), 251-263.

    doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001890

  • GALLIFORD, N. & FURNHAM, A. (2017). Individual differencefactors and beliefs in medical and political conspiracy theories.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58 (5), 422-428.

    doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12382

  • GOODMAN, J. & CARMICHAEL, F. (2020). Coronavirus: Bill Gates“Microchip” conspiracy theory and other vaccine claims fact-checked. BBC News, www.bbc.com/news/52847648.

  • GOREIS, A. & VORACEK, M. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological research on conspiracy beliefs: Fieldcharacteristics, measurement instruments, and associations withpersonality traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.

    doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00205

  • GRZESIAK-FELDMAN, M. (2013). The effect of high-anxietysituations on conspiracy thinking. Current Psychology: A Journalfor Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 32 (1),100-118.

    doi.org/10.1007/s12144-013-9165-6

  • JOLLEY, D. & DOUGLAS, K.M. (2014). The social consequencesof conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreasesintentions to engage in politics and to reduce one’s carbonfootprint. British Journal of Psychology, 105 (1), 35-56.

    doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12018

  • JOLLEY, D., DOUGLAS, K.M., SKIPPER, Y., THOMAS, E. &COOKSON, D. (2021). Measuring adolescents’ beliefs inconspiracy theories: Development and validation of theAdolescent Conspiracy Beliefs Questionnaire (ACBQ). BritishJournal of Developmental Psychology, 39 (3), 499-520.

    doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12368

  • JÖRESKOG, K.G. & SÖRBOM, D. (1982). Recent developments instructural equation modeling. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 404-416.

    doi.org/10.2307/3151714

  • McHOSKEY, J.W. (1995). Case closed? On the John F. Kennedyassassination: Biased assimilation of evidence and attitudepolarization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17 (3), 395-409.

    doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1703_7

  • McMANUS, S., D’ARDENNE, J. & WESSELY, S. (2020). Covidconspiracies: Misleading evidence can be more damaging thanno evidence at all. Psychological Medicine, 52 (3), 597-598.

    doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720002184

  • SALLAM, M., DABABSEH, D., YASEEN, A., AL-HAIDAR, A.,ABABNEH, N.A., BAKRI, F.G. & MAHAFZAH, A. (2020).Conspiracy beliefs are associated with lower knowledge andhigher anxiety levels regarding Covid-19 among students at theUniversity of Jordan. International Journal of EnvironmentalResearch and Public Health, 17 (14), 4915.

    doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17144915

  • SCHUMACKER, R.E. & LOMAX, R.G. (2010). A beginner’s guideto structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Routledge Taylor &Francis Group.

  • STEIGER, J.H. (2000). Point estimation, hypothesis testing, andinterval estimation using the RMSEA: Some comments and areply to Hayduck and Glaser. Structural Equation Modeling, 7 (2),149-162.

    doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0702_1

  • STOJANOV, A. & HALBERSTADT, J. (2019). The ConspiracyMentality Scale: Distinguishing between irrational andrational suspicion. Social Psychology, 50 (4), 215-232.

    doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000381

  • SWAMI, V. (2012). Social psychological origins of conspiracytheories: The case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia.Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 280.

    doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00280

  • SWAMI, V., CHAMORRO-PREMUZIC, T. & FURNHAM, A.(2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigationof personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24 (6), 749-761.

    doi.org/10.1002/acp.1583

  • TUCKER, L.R. & LEWIS, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient formaximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38 (1), 1-10.

    doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170

  • USCINSKI, J.E. & PARENT, J.M. (2014). American conspiracytheories. Oxford University Press.

  • VAN PROOIJEN, J.W. (2017). Why education predicts decreasedbelief in conspiracy theories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 50-58.

    doi.org/10.1002/acp.3301

  • VAN PROOIJEN, J.W. & ACKER, M. (2015). The influence ofcontrol on belief in conspiracy theories: Conceptual and appliedextensions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29 (5), 753-761.

    doi.org/10.1002/acp.3161

  • VAN PROOIJEN, J.W., KROUWEL, A.P.M. & POLLET, T.V. (2015).Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories.Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6 (5), 570-578.

    doi.org/10.1177/1948550614567356

  • WOOD, M.J. (2017), Conspiracy suspicions as a proxy for beliefs inconspiracy theories: Implications for theory and measurement.British Journal of Psychology, 108 (3), 507-527.

    doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12231
SHOW ALL REFERENCES (34)HIDE REFERENCES

Related articles

Article info

Issue:

Issue 298

Keywords:

Conspiracist ideation

Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale

Italian validation

Views:

89

Downloads:

26

Cite the article:

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Antichi Lorenzo . Olcese Martina . Prestia Davide . Barbagallo Giacomo . Migliorini Laura . Giannini Marco . Italian validation of the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale (GCBS). BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2023;298(1):99-114. doi:10.26387/bpa.298.1.
CITE THE ARTICLE
10213

Giunti Psychometrics

Giunti Psychometrics is the historic publisher of psychometric tests, psychology books, CME training courses and psychodiagnostic tools.

BPA - BULLETIN OF APPLIED PSYHOLOGY

Scientific Director: Alessandro Zennaro

Copyright © 2021 by Giunti Psychometrics

MANAGEMENT AND EDITORIAL OFFICE

Via Fra Paolo Sarpi, 7/A

50136 Firenze

Tel. 055 6236 501

mail: bpa@giuntipsy.com

ABOUT US
Copyright © 2021 Giunti Psychometrics | P. IVA 00421250481 · Giunti Psychometrics Srl, tutti i diritti riservati Responsabile della Protezione dei Dati (Art. 37 del REG UE 2016/679) Avv. Victoria Parise privacy@giuntipsy.com

Citation tool

How to cite this article

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Antichi Lorenzo . Olcese Martina . Prestia Davide . Barbagallo Giacomo . Migliorini Laura . Giannini Marco . Italian validation of the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale (GCBS). BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2023;298(1):99-114. doi:10.26387/bpa.298.1.