The Meaning in Work Inventory: Validation of the Italian version and its association with sociodemographic variables

Francesco Tommasi, Riccardo Sartori, Andrea Ceschi, Tatjana Schnell

Accepted August 31, 2021

First published August 31, 2021

Abstract

This paper introduces the Meaning in Work Inventory (ME-Work), a psychometric scale formed by examining meaning in work theories in analogy with the meaning in life research evidence. The ME-Work is a modular questionnaire aimed to assess three independent aspects of meaning in work, i.e., work as a source meaning (module 1), meaningful and meaningless work (module 2), and facets of meaning in work, namely, coherence, significance, purpose and belonging (module 3). An Italian sample of 624 participants completed a survey regarding personal and organizational characteristics in addition to the ME-Work. Both confirmatory analysis and structural equation modelling have been used to respectively assess psychometric properties of the Italian version of the ME-Work and the associations of the three modules. A series of MANOVAs examined socio-demographic differences in ME-Work dimensions. The contribution ends by discussing the results and limitations of the study. Further avenues for research and practice are presented.

References

  • ALLAN, B.A., AUTIN, K.L. & DUFFY, R.D. (2016a). Self-determination and meaningful work: Exploring socioeconomicconstraints. Frontiers in Psychology, 71 (7), 1-9.

  • ALLAN, B.A., BATZ-BARBARICH, C., STERLING, H.M. & TAY, L.(2019). Outcomes of meaningful work: A meta-analysis. Journalof Management Studies, 56 (3), 500-528.

  • BAILEY, C. & MADDEN, A. (2019). “We’re not scum, we’re human”:Agential responses in the face of meaningless work. ScandinavianJournal of Management, 35 (4), 101064.

  • BEADLE, R. & KNIGHT, K. (2012). Virtue and meaningful work.Business Ethics Quarterly, 22 (2), 433-450.

  • BELLAH, R.N., MADSEN, R., SULLIVAN, W.M., SWIDLE, A. &TIPTON, S.M. (1986). Habits of the heart. Individualism andcommitment in American life. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

  • BLUSTEIN, D.L. (2006). The psychology of working: A new perspectivefor career development, counseling, and public policy. New York,NY: Routledge.

  • BLUSTEIN, D.L. (Ed.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of the psychologyof working. Corydon, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • BLUSTEIN, D.L., KENNY, M.E., DI FABIO, A. & GUICHARD, J.(2019). Expanding the impact of the psychology of working:Engaging psychology in the struggle for decent work and humanrights. Journal of Career Assessment, 27 (1), 3-28.

  • BOTH-NWABUWE, J.M.C., DIJKSTRA, M.T.M. & BEERSMA, B.(2017). Sweeping the floor or putting a man on the moon: Howto define and measure meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology,8 (Sep.), 1-14.

  • BRANCATO, G., MACCHIA, S., MURGIA, M., SIGNORE,M., SIMEONI, G., BLANKE, K. et al. (2006). Handbook ofrecommended practices for questionnaire development andtesting in the European statistical system. Brussels: EuropeanCommission Press.

  • DI FABIO, A. & BLUSTEIN, D.L. (2016). From meaning of workingto meaningful lives: The challenges of expanding decent work.Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1119.

  • DI FABIO, A., GIANNINI, M., LOSCALZO, Y., PALAZZESCHI, L.,BUCCI, O., GUAZZINI, A. & GORI, A. (2016). The challenge offostering healthy organizations: An empirical study on the roleof workplace relational civility in acceptance of change and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-9.

  • DUFFY, R.D., ALLAN, B.A., ENGLAND, J.W., BLUSTEIN, D.L.,AUTIN, K.L., DOUGLASS, R.P., … & SANTOS, E.J. (2017). Thedevelopment and initial validation of the decent work scale.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64, 206-221.

  • GEORGE, L.S. & PARK, C.L. (2016). Meaning in life ascomprehension, purpose, and mattering: Toward integration andnew research questions. Review of General Psychology, 20 (3),205-220.

  • GROENEVELD, S., LEISINK, P., TUMMERS, L. & DEN DULK, L.(2011). Meaningful work for a meaningful life? Work alienationand its effects in the work and the family context. Conferencepresentation at NIG Conference 2011 Workshop: Strategic HRMin the Public Sector and Public Values, May 2014.

  • HACKMAN, J.R. & OLDHAM, G.R. (1976). Motivation throughthe design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior &Human Performance, 16, 250-279.

  • HARZER, C. & STEGER, M.F. (2012). Meaning at work: The GermanadaptationoftheWorkandMeaningInventory(WAMI).Moscow:Poster at 6th European Conference on Positive Psychology(ECPP, 2012).

  • HOFMEISTER, H. (2019). Work through a gender lens: More workand more sources of meaningfulness. In R. Yeoman, K. Bailey,A. Madden & M. Thompson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook ofmeaningful work. Corydon, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • HÖGE, T. & SCHNELL, T. (2012). Kein arbeitsengagementohne sinnerfüllung. Eine studie zum zusammenhang vonwork engagement, sinnerfüllung und tätigkeitsmerkmalen.Wirtschaftspsychologie, 1, 91-99.

  • HU, L. & BENTLER, P. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structuremodeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized modelmisspecification. Psychological Methods, 3 (4), 424-453.

  • HU, J. & HIRSH, J.B. (2017). Accepting lower salaries for meaningfulwork. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 (Sep.), 1-10.

  • LEPISTO, D.A. & PRATT, M.G. (2017). Meaningful work asrealization and justification: Toward a dual conceptualization.Organizational Psychology Review, 7 (2), 99-121.

  • LIPS-WIERSMA, M. & MORRIS, L. (2009). Discriminating betweenmeaningful work and the management of meaning. Journal ofBusiness Ethics, 88 (3), 491-511.

  • LIPS-WIERSMA, M. & WRIGHT, S. (2012). Measuring the meaningof meaningful work: Development and validation of theComprehensive Meaningful Work Scale (CMWS). Group andOrganization Management, 37 (5), 655-685.

  • LIPS-WIERSMA, M., WRIGHT, S. & DIK, B. (2016). Meaningfulwork: Differences among blue-, pink-, and white-collaroccupations. Career Development International, 21 (5), 534-551.

  • LYSOVA, E.I., ALLAN, B.A., DIK, B.J., DUFFY, R.D. & STEGER, M.F.(2019). Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110,374-389.

  • MARTELA, F. & PESSI, A.B. (2018). Significant work is about self-realization and broader purpose: Defining the key dimensions ofmeaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.

  • MARTELA, F. & RIEKKI, T.J.J. (2018). Autonomy, competence,relatedness, and beneficence: A multicultural comparison of thefour pathways to meaningful work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9,1-14.

  • MICHAELSON, C., PRATT, M.G., GRANT, A.M. & DUNN, C.P.(2014). Meaningful work: Connecting business ethics andorganization studies. Journal of Business Ethics, 121, 77-90.

  • MOTTAZ, C.J. (1981). Some determinants of work alienation. TheSociological Quarterly, 22 (4), 515-529.

  • OELBERGER, C.R. (2019). The dark side of deeply meaningfulwork: Work-relationship turmoil and the moderating role ofoccupational value homophily. Journal of Management Studies,56 (3), 558-588.

  • PRATT, M.G. & ASHFORTH, B.E. (2003). Fostering meaningfulnessin working and at work. In K.S. Cameron, J.E. Dutton & R.E.Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations ofa new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler.

  • PUCHALSKA-KAMINSKA, M., CZERW, A. & ROCZNIEWSKA,M. (2019). Work meaning in self and world perspective: a newoutlook on the WAMI scale. Social Psychological Bulletin, 14 (1),1-29.

  • ROSSO, B.D., DEKAS, K.H. & WRZESNIEWSKI, A. (2010). On themeaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Researchin Organizational Behavior, 30 (C), 91-127.

  • ROTHMANN, S., WEISS, L.A. & REDELINGHUYS, J.J. (2019).Cultural, national, and individual diversity and their relationshipto the experience of meaningful work. In R. Yeoman, K. Bailey,A. Madden & M. Thompson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook ofmeaningful work. Corydon, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • SCHNELL, T. (2009). The Sources of Meaning and Meaning in LifeQuestionnaire (SoMe): Relations to demographics and well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4 (6), 483-499.

  • SCHNELL, T. (2010). Existential indifference: Another qualityof meaning in life. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 50 (3),351-373.

  • SCHNELL, T. (2020). Psychology of meaning in life. New York, NY:Routledge.

  • SCHNELL, T. & BECKER, P. (2006). Personality and meaning in life.Personality and Individual Differences, 41 (1), 117-129.

  • SCHNELL, T. & HOFFMANN, C. (2020). ME-Work: A modularinventory to measure meaning in work. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.

  • SCHNELL, T., HÖGE, T., & POLLET, E. (2013). Predicting meaningin work: Theory, data, implications. Journal of Positive Psychology,8 (6), 543-554.

  • SCHNELL, T., HÖGE, T. & WEBER, W.G. (2019). “Belonging”and its relationship to the experience of meaningful work. InR. Yeoman, K. Bailey, A. Madden & M. Thompson (Eds.), TheOxford handbook of meaningful work. Corydon, UK: OxfordUniversity Press.

  • SCHNELL, T. & KEENAN, W.J.F. (2011). Meaning-making in anatheist world. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 33 (1), 55-78.

  • STEGER, M.F. (2019). Meaning in life and in work. In R. Yeoman, K.Bailey, A. Madden & M. Thompson (Eds.), The Oxford handbookof meaningful work. Corydon, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • STEGER, M.F. & DIK, B.J. (2013). Work as meaning: Individualand organizational benefit of engaging in meaningful work. ThéOxford Handbook of Positive Psychology and Work, 131-142.

  • STEGER, M.F., DIK, B.J. & DUFFY, R.D. (2012). Measuringmeaningful work: The Work and Meaning Inventory (WAMI).Journal of Career Assessment, 20 (3), 322-337.

  • TAJFEL, H. & TURNER, J. (1986). The social identity theory ofintergroup behavior. In S.A. Worchel, Psychology of intergrouprelation. Chicago: Hall Publishers.

  • TOMMASI, F., CESCHI, A. & SARTORI, R. (2020) Viewingmeaningfulworkthroughthelensoftime.FrontiersinPsychology,11, 1-12.

  • TROCHIM, W.M. & DONNELLY, J.P. (2010). Research methodsknowledge base. Mason, OH: Atomic Dog Publishing.

  • TWENGE, J.M. (2010). A review of the empirical evidence ongenerational differences in work attitudes. Journal of Businessand Psychology, 25 (2), 201-210.

  • WARD, S.J. & KING, L.A. (2017). Work and the good life: Howwork contributes to meaning in life. Research in OrganizationalBehavior, 37, 59-82.

  • WEBER, W.G., UNTERRAINER, C. & HÖGE, T. (2020).Psychological research on organisational democracy: A meta-analysis of individual, organisational, and societal outcomes.Applied Psychology, 69 (3), 1009-1071.

  • WEEKS, K.P. & SCHAFFERT, C. (2019). Generational differences indefinitions of meaningful work: A mixed methods study. Journalof Business Ethics, 156 (4), 1045-1061.

  • WILLNER, T., LIPSHITS-BRAZILER, Y. & GATI, I. (2020).Construction and initial validation of the Work OrientationQuestionnaire. Journal of Career Assessment, 28 (1), 109-127.

  • WOLF, E.J., HARRINGTON, K.M., CLARK, S.L. & MILLER, M.W.(2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models:An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educationaland Psychological Measurement, 76 (6), 913-934.

  • WRZESNIEWSKI, A. (2003). Finding positive meaning in work.In K.S. Cameron, J.E. Dutton & R.E. Quinn (Eds.), Positiveorganizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. SanFrancisco, CA: Berret-Koehler.

  • WRZESNIEWSKI, A., McCAULEY, C., ROZIN, P. & SCHWARTZ,B. (1997). Jobs, careers, and callings: People’s relations to theirwork. Journal of Research in Personality, 31 (31), 21-33.

SHOW ALL REFERENCES (57)HIDE REFERENCES

Related articles

Article info

Issue:

Keywords:

Views:

406

Downloads:

118

Cite the article:

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Tommasi Francesco. Sartori Riccardo. Ceschi Andrea. Schnell Tatjana. The Meaning in Work Inventory: Validation of the Italian version and its association with sociodemographic variables. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2021;291(1):17-36.

Citation tool

How to cite this article

Author Surname Author Initial. Title. Publication Title. Year Published;Volume number(Issue number):Pages Used. doi:DOI Number.


Tommasi Francesco. Sartori Riccardo. Ceschi Andrea. Schnell Tatjana. The Meaning in Work Inventory: Validation of the Italian version and its association with sociodemographic variables. BPA Applied Psychology Bulletin. 2021;291(1):17-36.